Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Guzman, 96-50226 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 96-50226 Visitors: 15
Filed: Nov. 06, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-50226 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DEMETRIUS GUZMAN, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-94-CR-97 - - - - - - - - - - October 24, 1996 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Demetrius Guzman (#66401-079) has applied for leave to proceed in forma pa
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 96-50226
                        Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                          Plaintiff-Appellee,


versus

DEMETRIUS GUZMAN,

                                          Defendant-Appellant.


                        - - - - - - - - - -
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                 for the Western District of Texas
                        USDC No. W-94-CR-97
                        - - - - - - - - - -
                          October 24, 1996
Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Demetrius Guzman (#66401-079) has applied for leave to

proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in this appeal from the denial of

his motion for production of court records.   There is no pending

appeal from Guzman’s criminal conviction, and Guzman has not

filed a post-conviction motion challenging his conviction or

sentence.   See 28 U.S.C. § 753(f).   A federal prisoner who has

not attempted to file a petition collaterally attacking his

     *
        Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
                          No. 96-50226
                              - 2 -

conviction is not entitled to obtain copies of court records at

government expense to search for possible error.   Skinner v.

United States, 
434 F.2d 1036
, 1037 (5th Cir. 1970).   The motion

for leave to proceed IFP is DENIED.   Because the appeal is

frivolous, it is DISMISSED.   5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer