Warren v. Chater, 96-60188 (1996)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 96-60188
Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 13, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-60188 Summary Calendar JOHN WARREN, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus SHIRLEY S. CHATER, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:94-CV-720-L-N - - - - - - - - - - October 31, 1996 Before GARWWOOD, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* John Warren appeals the district court’s affirmance of the denial
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-60188 Summary Calendar JOHN WARREN, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus SHIRLEY S. CHATER, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:94-CV-720-L-N - - - - - - - - - - October 31, 1996 Before GARWWOOD, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* John Warren appeals the district court’s affirmance of the denial ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-60188 Summary Calendar JOHN WARREN, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus SHIRLEY S. CHATER, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:94-CV-720-L-N - - - - - - - - - - October 31, 1996 Before GARWWOOD, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* John Warren appeals the district court’s affirmance of the denial of his claim for social security disability benefits. He argues that the determination that he could perform his past relevant work was not supported by substantial evidence. We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and AFFIRM for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge and * Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. - 2 - adopted by the district court. Warren v. Chater, No. 3:94CV720LN (S.D. Miss. Jan 18, 1996).
Source: CourtListener
