Filed: Dec. 16, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit No. 96-10615 Summary Calendar J. M. MITCHELL; THOMAS C. MOORE, Plaintiffs - Counter Defendants - Appellees, VERSUS THE CADLE COMPANY, an Ohio Corporation, Defendant - Counter Claimant - Cross Claimant - Appellant, COMBINED FINANCIAL CORPORATION, Defendant - Cross Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Texas (2:94-CV-353) December 6, 1996 Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges. P
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit No. 96-10615 Summary Calendar J. M. MITCHELL; THOMAS C. MOORE, Plaintiffs - Counter Defendants - Appellees, VERSUS THE CADLE COMPANY, an Ohio Corporation, Defendant - Counter Claimant - Cross Claimant - Appellant, COMBINED FINANCIAL CORPORATION, Defendant - Cross Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Texas (2:94-CV-353) December 6, 1996 Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PE..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
For the Fifth Circuit
No. 96-10615
Summary Calendar
J. M. MITCHELL; THOMAS C. MOORE,
Plaintiffs - Counter Defendants - Appellees,
VERSUS
THE CADLE COMPANY, an Ohio Corporation,
Defendant - Counter Claimant -
Cross Claimant - Appellant,
COMBINED FINANCIAL CORPORATION,
Defendant - Cross Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Northern District of Texas
(2:94-CV-353)
December 6, 1996
Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Defendant-Appellant Cadle Company appeals a judgment against
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under
the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
it in this case brought under the federal and Texas fair debt
collection statutes. 15 U.S.C. § 1692a et seq; TEX. REV. CIV. STAT.
ANN. art. 5069-11.01 et seq. The jury found in favor of plaintiffs
J. M. Mitchell and Thomas C. Moore, awarding the pair $5,000 each
in actual damages, $20,000 in punitive damages and attorneys’ fees.
Having reviewed the briefs of the parties, the record excerpts
and relevant portions of the record, we are persuaded that the
district court committed no reversible error. Accordingly, the
judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.