Filed: Dec. 16, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-50235 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus GEORGE RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-95-CV-430 - - - - - - - - - - December 4, 1996 Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* George Rodriguez, federal inmate #56267-080, appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-50235 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus GEORGE RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-95-CV-430 - - - - - - - - - - December 4, 1996 Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* George Rodriguez, federal inmate #56267-080, appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion...
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-50235
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
GEORGE RODRIGUEZ,
Defendant-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. A-95-CV-430
- - - - - - - - - -
December 4, 1996
Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
George Rodriguez, federal inmate #56267-080, appeals the
denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion.
To the extent that Rodriguez requires a certificate of
appealability (COA) in order to appeal the district court’s
order, we conclude that Rodriguez has not made a substantial
showing of the denial of a federal right. See 28 U.S.C.
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
§ 2253(c)(2). Whether or not a COA is required, Rodriguez’s
arguments lack merit and the district court did not err in
denying § 2255 relief.
AFFIRMED. COA DENIED.