United States v. Jovic, 96-30735 (1997)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 96-30735
Visitors: 11
Filed: Apr. 24, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-30735 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANDJELKO JOVIC, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 95-CR-353-R - - - - - - - - - - April 15, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Andjelko Jovic argues that the district court erred in determining that the drug quantity a
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-30735 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANDJELKO JOVIC, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 95-CR-353-R - - - - - - - - - - April 15, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Andjelko Jovic argues that the district court erred in determining that the drug quantity at..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-30735 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANDJELKO JOVIC, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 95-CR-353-R - - - - - - - - - - April 15, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Andjelko Jovic argues that the district court erred in determining that the drug quantity attributable to him under the sentencing guidelines was between 2 and 3.5 kilograms of cocaine. He also avers that the district court “misapplied the law” and “erroneously held [him] to the burden of proving less than the two kilogram finding recommended in the presentence report.” We have reviewed the record and the briefs on appeal and find no * Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-30735 - 2 - error. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED for essentially the same reasons set forth by the district court. United States v. Andjelko Jovic, No. 95-CR-353-R (E.D. La. July 15, 1996). AFFIRMED.
Source: CourtListener
