Filed: Apr. 24, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-40750 Summary Calendar SHEET METAL WORKERS’ INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, LOCAL UNION NO. 337; J.C. HART, III Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus TYLER, CITY OF TEXAS, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (6:96-CV-350) April 17, 1997 Before JOHNSON, WIENER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Sheet Metal Workers’ International Association (union) and J.C. Hart, III app
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-40750 Summary Calendar SHEET METAL WORKERS’ INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, LOCAL UNION NO. 337; J.C. HART, III Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus TYLER, CITY OF TEXAS, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (6:96-CV-350) April 17, 1997 Before JOHNSON, WIENER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Sheet Metal Workers’ International Association (union) and J.C. Hart, III appe..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-40750
Summary Calendar
SHEET METAL WORKERS’ INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, LOCAL UNION NO.
337; J.C. HART, III
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
versus
TYLER, CITY OF TEXAS,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the
Eastern District of Texas
(6:96-CV-350)
April 17, 1997
Before JOHNSON, WIENER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Sheet Metal Workers’ International Association (union) and
J.C. Hart, III appeal a judgment entered in favor of the City of
Tyler, Texas, after a bench trial. The district court’s findings
of fact were not clearly erroneous. See Seal v. Knorpp,
957 F.2d
1230, 1234 (5th Cir. 1992). Furthermore, the district court did
not err in concluding that the City’s no smoking ordinance is not
preempted by the National Labor Relations Act. See Metropolitan
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
Life Ins. Co. v. Massachusetts,
471 U.S. 724, 753-55 (1985). The
district court also did not err in concluding that the ordinance
does not violate the Contracts Clause or the Due Process Clause of
the United States Constitution. See Keystone Bitmus Coal Ass’n v.
DeBenedictis,
480 U.S. 470, 502-03 (1987); Energy Reserves Group,
Inc. v. Kansas Power and Light Co.,
459 U.S. 400, 411-12 (1983);
Allied Structural Steel Co. v. Spannaus,
438 U.S. 234, 241-42
(1978); FM Properties Operating Co. v. City of Austin,
93 F.3d 167,
175 (5th Cir. 1996).
AFFIRMED.
2