Filed: Apr. 24, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-50145 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GARY L. TROLLINGER, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-95-CR-94 - - - - - - - - - - April 17, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Gary L. Trollinger appeals his conditional guilty-plea conviction for felon in possession of
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-50145 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GARY L. TROLLINGER, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-95-CR-94 - - - - - - - - - - April 17, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Gary L. Trollinger appeals his conditional guilty-plea conviction for felon in possession of ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-50145
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GARY L. TROLLINGER,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. W-95-CR-94
- - - - - - - - - -
April 17, 1997
Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Gary L. Trollinger appeals his conditional guilty-plea
conviction for felon in possession of a firearm in violation of
18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He argues that Congress exceeded its
authority under the Commerce Clause and the Tenth Amendment in
enacting § 922(g)(1). Trollinger’s claims are without merit. We
have held that § 922(g)(1) is constitutionally valid under the
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 96-50145
- 2 -
Commerce Clause. United States v. Rawls,
85 F.3d 240 (5th Cir.
1996). As to the Tenth Amendment claim, Trollinger has not
demonstrated error, plain or otherwise. United States v. Olano,
507 U.S. 725, 731-37 (1993).
AFFIRMED.