Filed: Apr. 24, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-50484 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE ANGEL ORTIZ, a/k/a Chaeto, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-95-CR-83(2) - - - - - - - - - - April 15, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jose Angel Ortiz pleaded guilty to count 1 of an indictment charging him with
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-50484 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE ANGEL ORTIZ, a/k/a Chaeto, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-95-CR-83(2) - - - - - - - - - - April 15, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jose Angel Ortiz pleaded guilty to count 1 of an indictment charging him with ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-50484
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE ANGEL ORTIZ, a/k/a Chaeto,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. A-95-CR-83(2)
- - - - - - - - - -
April 15, 1997
Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Jose Angel Ortiz pleaded guilty to count 1 of an indictment
charging him with conspiracy to distribute cocaine and has
appealed his sentence. The Government contends that the appeal
should be dismissed because Ortiz waived his statutory appellate
rights in his plea agreement with the Government. Ortiz argues
that the waiver was not knowing and voluntary because his
sentence had not yet been determined at the time he entered his
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
No. 96-50484
- 2 -
guilty plea. The district court determined that Ortiz understood
that he had a right to appeal his sentence and that he was
waiving that right by entering a guilty plea under the terms of
the plea agreement with the Government. No objection was raised
and there is no reason to believe that Ortiz did not know what he
was doing. See United States v. Portillo,
18 F.3d 290, 292 (5th Cir. 1994); United States
v. Melancon,
972 F.2d 566, 568 (5th Cir. 1992). The appeal is frivolous and is
DISMISSED. See Howard v. King,
707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.
1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
APPEAL DISMISSED.