Filed: Apr. 24, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-60414 Conference Calendar HENRY MARTIN ROCHA-BARAHONA, Petitioner, versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. - - - - - - - - - - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals A26 548 709 - - - - - - - - - - April 15, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Henry Martin Rocha-Barahona petitions this court to review the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decisi
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-60414 Conference Calendar HENRY MARTIN ROCHA-BARAHONA, Petitioner, versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. - - - - - - - - - - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals A26 548 709 - - - - - - - - - - April 15, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Henry Martin Rocha-Barahona petitions this court to review the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decisio..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-60414
Conference Calendar
HENRY MARTIN ROCHA-BARAHONA,
Petitioner,
versus
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
Respondent.
- - - - - - - - - -
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
A26 548 709
- - - - - - - - - -
April 15, 1997
Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Henry Martin Rocha-Barahona petitions this court to review
the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision denying his
application to reopen his suspension of deportation proceeding.
Rocha-Barahona contends that he has presented new evidence
showing that his deportation will cause extreme hardship. We
have reviewed the record, the BIA’s decision, and the briefs and
find no abuse of discretion. See Hernandez-Cordero v. INS,
819
F.2d 558, 560 (5th Cir. 1987) (en banc).
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
No. 96-60469
- 2 -
PETITION DENIED.