Filed: Apr. 24, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 97-20171 Summary Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JORGE LUIS GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-95-CR-142-10 _ April 16, 1997 Before KING, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jorge Luis Garcia appeals from the district court’s order affirming the magistrate judge’s order of detention pending trial. The dist
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 97-20171 Summary Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JORGE LUIS GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-95-CR-142-10 _ April 16, 1997 Before KING, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jorge Luis Garcia appeals from the district court’s order affirming the magistrate judge’s order of detention pending trial. The distr..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 97-20171
Summary Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JORGE LUIS GARCIA,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-95-CR-142-10
_________________________________________________________________
April 16, 1997
Before KING, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Jorge Luis Garcia appeals from the district court’s order
affirming the magistrate judge’s order of detention pending trial.
The district court’s decision rests on its conclusion that Garcia
presents a danger to the community and a risk of flight, and that
no conditions will reasonably assure Garcia’s appearance. 18
U.S.C. § 3142(e) & (f). The district court’s conclusion is
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
supported by the record. See United States v. Rueben,
974 F.2d
580, 586 (5th Cir. 1992), cert. denied,
507 U.S. 940 (1993). The
district court’s detention order is AFFIRMED. The Government’s
motion to consolidate is DENIED.
AFFIRMED. MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE DENIED.
2