Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Garcia, 97-20171 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 97-20171 Visitors: 10
Filed: Apr. 24, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 97-20171 Summary Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JORGE LUIS GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-95-CR-142-10 _ April 16, 1997 Before KING, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jorge Luis Garcia appeals from the district court’s order affirming the magistrate judge’s order of detention pending trial. The dist
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT


                       ____________________

                           No. 97-20171

                         Summary Calendar
                       ____________________


     UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                          Plaintiff-Appellee,

     v.

     JORGE LUIS GARCIA,

                                          Defendant-Appellant.


_________________________________________________________________

           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                      USDC No. H-95-CR-142-10
_________________________________________________________________
                           April 16, 1997
Before KING, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Jorge Luis Garcia appeals from the district court’s order

affirming the magistrate judge’s order of detention pending trial.

The district court’s decision rests on its conclusion that Garcia

presents a danger to the community and a risk of flight, and that

no conditions will reasonably assure Garcia’s appearance.        18

U.S.C. § 3142(e) & (f).      The district court’s conclusion is

     *
      Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
supported by the record.    See United States v. Rueben, 
974 F.2d 580
, 586 (5th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 
507 U.S. 940
(1993).   The

district court’s detention order is AFFIRMED.    The Government’s

motion to consolidate is DENIED.

     AFFIRMED.   MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE DENIED.




                                   2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer