Filed: May 12, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 95-10979 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SHERRY B. GROEPLER, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:94-CV-809-H - - - - - - - - - - April 25, 1997 Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Sherry A. Groepler, # 13698-018, appeals the district court’s denial of her motion to vacate, se
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 95-10979 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SHERRY B. GROEPLER, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:94-CV-809-H - - - - - - - - - - April 25, 1997 Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Sherry A. Groepler, # 13698-018, appeals the district court’s denial of her motion to vacate, set..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-10979
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SHERRY B. GROEPLER,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:94-CV-809-H
- - - - - - - - - -
April 25, 1997
Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Sherry A. Groepler, # 13698-018, appeals the district
court’s denial of her motion to vacate, set aside, or correct
sentence brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We need not
determine whether Groepler needs a certificate of appealability
(COA) under the newly enacted Antiterrorism and Effective Death
Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214
(1996); 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). After reviewing the record
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 95-10979
- 2 -
and the arguments on appeal, we would neither grant a COA if the
amendment applies, nor would we grant relief under the unamended
version of § 2255. We make this determination for substantially
the reasons adopted by the district court. United States v.
Groepler, 3:94-CV-809-H (N.D. Tex., Aug. 22, 1995). In addition,
we hold that Groepler has not demonstrated plain error in arguing
that the sentencing guidelines unconstitutionally discriminate
against women.
AFFIRMED.