Filed: May 12, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 95-41009 Summary Calendar LEE ANTHONY JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus ANN RICHARDS, Governor of Texas, ET AL., Defendants, C. RAINE ET AL. Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:94-cv-197 - - - - - - - - - - April 25, 1997 Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Texas prisoner Lee Anthony Johnson, No. 290961, moves
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 95-41009 Summary Calendar LEE ANTHONY JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus ANN RICHARDS, Governor of Texas, ET AL., Defendants, C. RAINE ET AL. Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:94-cv-197 - - - - - - - - - - April 25, 1997 Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Texas prisoner Lee Anthony Johnson, No. 290961, moves ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-41009
Summary Calendar
LEE ANTHONY JOHNSON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
ANN RICHARDS, Governor of Texas, ET AL.,
Defendants,
C. RAINE ET AL.
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 6:94-cv-197
- - - - - - - - - -
April 25, 1997
Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Texas prisoner Lee Anthony Johnson, No. 290961, moves this
court for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal from
the dismissal of his civil rights complaint. On January 15,
1997, Johnson was ordered to file an application to proceed IFP
on appeal which complied with the requirements of the Prison
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 95-41009
- 2 -
Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA). The order held Johnson’s
appeal in abeyance for 30 days pending payment of the $105 filing
fee or submission of the required documents pursuant to the PLRA.
Johnson timely responded; however, the documentation submitted by
Johnson does not comply with the requirements imposed by the PLRA
because he did not submit information regarding his prison trust
account for the period required. See § 1915(a), (b).
Accordingly, Johnson’s motion for leave to proceed IFP on appeal
is DENIED, and his appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
See 5th Cir. R. 42.3. Should Johnson wish to reinstate his
appeal, he is instructed to pay the $105 filing fee to the clerk
of the district court within 30 days from the date of this order.
MOTION DENIED. APPEAL DISMISSED.