Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Eruchalu v. INS, 96-31190 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 96-31190 Visitors: 25
Filed: May 05, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-31190 Conference Calendar CHRISTOPHER ERUCHALU, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 96-CV-1075 - - - - - - - - - - April 15, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Because there is no final district court order, we lack jurisdiction ove
More
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                              No. 96-31190
                          Conference Calendar



CHRISTOPHER ERUCHALU,
                                           Plaintiff-Appellant,


versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
                                           Defendant-Appellee.


                        - - - - - - - - - -
           Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Western District of Louisiana
                        USDC No. 96-CV-1075
                        - - - - - - - - - -
                           April 15, 1997
Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Because there is no final district court order, we lack

jurisdiction over the appeal of Immigration and Naturalization

Service (INS) detainee Christopher Eruchalu, Sr., No. 316581.     28

U.S.C. § 1291.    We note the correctness of the district court’s

determination that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over

Eruchalu’s petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241.     Accordingly, we

DISMISS AS MOOT Eruchalu’s motions for a stay of deportation and

appointment of counsel.

     *
        Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
                     No.
                    - 2 -

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer