Filed: May 05, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-31190 Conference Calendar CHRISTOPHER ERUCHALU, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 96-CV-1075 - - - - - - - - - - April 15, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Because there is no final district court order, we lack jurisdiction ove
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-31190 Conference Calendar CHRISTOPHER ERUCHALU, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 96-CV-1075 - - - - - - - - - - April 15, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Because there is no final district court order, we lack jurisdiction over..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-31190
Conference Calendar
CHRISTOPHER ERUCHALU,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
Defendant-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 96-CV-1075
- - - - - - - - - -
April 15, 1997
Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Because there is no final district court order, we lack
jurisdiction over the appeal of Immigration and Naturalization
Service (INS) detainee Christopher Eruchalu, Sr., No. 316581. 28
U.S.C. § 1291. We note the correctness of the district court’s
determination that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over
Eruchalu’s petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Accordingly, we
DISMISS AS MOOT Eruchalu’s motions for a stay of deportation and
appointment of counsel.
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No.
- 2 -
APPEAL DISMISSED.