Filed: May 05, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-41000 Conference Calendar JOHN WILLIAM DICKEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS ET AL., Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 5:96-CV-192 - - - - - - - - - - April 17, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* John William Dickey appeals from the dismissal of his action under the Federal Tort
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-41000 Conference Calendar JOHN WILLIAM DICKEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS ET AL., Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 5:96-CV-192 - - - - - - - - - - April 17, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* John William Dickey appeals from the dismissal of his action under the Federal Tort ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-41000
Conference Calendar
JOHN WILLIAM DICKEY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS ET AL.,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:96-CV-192
- - - - - - - - - -
April 17, 1997
Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
John William Dickey appeals from the dismissal of his action
under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) and the Americans With
Disabilities Act (ADA) for failure to prosecute or comply with a
court order. Dickey, a former federal prisoner, seeks leave to
proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal.
Because Dickey has been released from prison, the Prison
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 96-41000
- 2 -
Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) does not apply to his appeal.
Because he proceeded IFP in the district court and that court did
not decertify Dickey’s IFP status, Dickey need not obtain leave
of this court to proceed IFP. His motion for leave to proceed
IFP is DENIED as unnecessary.
Dickey has not shown that the district court abused its
discretion by dismissing his action for failure to prosecute or
comply with a court order. McCullough v. Lynaugh,
835 F.2d 1126,
1127 (5th Cir. 1988). Dickey’s appeal lacks arguable merit and
is frivolous. Howard v. King,
707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.
1983).
APPEAL DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.