Filed: May 05, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-41056 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TROY DONOVAN BOUNDS, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. V-94-CR-1-2 - - - - - - - - - - April 17, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Government’s motion for the dismissal of Troy Donovan Bounds’s appeal from the denial
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-41056 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TROY DONOVAN BOUNDS, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. V-94-CR-1-2 - - - - - - - - - - April 17, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Government’s motion for the dismissal of Troy Donovan Bounds’s appeal from the denial ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-41056
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TROY DONOVAN BOUNDS,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. V-94-CR-1-2
- - - - - - - - - -
April 17, 1997
Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Government’s motion for the dismissal of Troy Donovan
Bounds’s appeal from the denial of his motion for the return of
property under FED. R. CRIM. P. 41(e) is DENIED. Bounds’s notice
of appeal was timely filed. Hunt v. United States Dep’t of
Justice,
2 F.3d 96, 97 (5th Cir. 1993).
Bounds concedes that the property he seeks to have returned
has been destroyed. His appeal therefore is moot. See Rocky v.
King,
900 F.2d 864, 867 (5th Cir. 1990). Because the appeal is
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 96-41056
- 2 -
moot, it is DISMISSED.