Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Bounds, 96-41056 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 96-41056 Visitors: 328
Filed: May 05, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-41056 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TROY DONOVAN BOUNDS, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. V-94-CR-1-2 - - - - - - - - - - April 17, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Government’s motion for the dismissal of Troy Donovan Bounds’s appeal from the denial
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                             No. 96-41056
                         Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                           Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TROY DONOVAN BOUNDS,

                                           Defendant-Appellant.

                        - - - - - - - - - -
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                       USDC No. V-94-CR-1-2
                        - - - - - - - - - -
                           April 17, 1997
Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Government’s motion for the dismissal of Troy Donovan

Bounds’s appeal from the denial of his motion for the return of

property under FED. R. CRIM. P. 41(e) is DENIED.   Bounds’s notice

of appeal was timely filed.    Hunt v. United States Dep’t of

Justice, 
2 F.3d 96
, 97 (5th Cir. 1993).

     Bounds concedes that the property he seeks to have returned

has been destroyed.    His appeal therefore is moot.   See Rocky v.

King, 
900 F.2d 864
, 867 (5th Cir. 1990).    Because the appeal is


     *
        Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
                         No. 96-41056
                             - 2 -

moot, it is DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer