Filed: Jun. 19, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-11405 Summary Calendar CAPITOL RESOURCE FUNDING, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, versus HOMESTEAD INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL., Defendants. HOMESTEAD INSURANCE COMPANY; CORINTHIAN MANAGEMENT, INC. Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (3:96-CV-1820-T) June 18, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, DAVIS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Capitol Resource Funding, Inc. appeals t
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-11405 Summary Calendar CAPITOL RESOURCE FUNDING, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, versus HOMESTEAD INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL., Defendants. HOMESTEAD INSURANCE COMPANY; CORINTHIAN MANAGEMENT, INC. Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (3:96-CV-1820-T) June 18, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, DAVIS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Capitol Resource Funding, Inc. appeals th..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-11405 Summary Calendar CAPITOL RESOURCE FUNDING, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, versus HOMESTEAD INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL., Defendants. HOMESTEAD INSURANCE COMPANY; CORINTHIAN MANAGEMENT, INC. Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (3:96-CV-1820-T) June 18, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, DAVIS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Capitol Resource Funding, Inc. appeals the Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal of its * Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. claims as barred by res judicata. After reviewing the briefs of the parties and the relevant portions of the record, we agree with the findings and conclusions in the district court’s well-reasoned order dated October 18, 1996. Capitol’s motion to supplement the record and Corinthian Management’s motion for leave to file a response to Capitol’s reply brief are denied. The judgment appealed is AFFIRMED. 2
