Filed: Jun. 19, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-60283 Summary Calendar BRYCE DALLAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus TOMMY JACKSON, Individually and Officially, ET AL., Defendants, TOMMY JACKSON, Individually and Officially, Defendant-Appellee. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * BRYCE DALLAS, Plaintiff, versus KENNETH MCLENDON ET AL., Defendants. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:93-CV-178-WS - - - - -
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-60283 Summary Calendar BRYCE DALLAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus TOMMY JACKSON, Individually and Officially, ET AL., Defendants, TOMMY JACKSON, Individually and Officially, Defendant-Appellee. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * BRYCE DALLAS, Plaintiff, versus KENNETH MCLENDON ET AL., Defendants. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:93-CV-178-WS - - - - - ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-60283
Summary Calendar
BRYCE DALLAS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
TOMMY JACKSON, Individually and Officially, ET AL.,
Defendants,
TOMMY JACKSON, Individually and Officially,
Defendant-Appellee.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
BRYCE DALLAS,
Plaintiff,
versus
KENNETH MCLENDON ET AL.,
Defendants.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
USDC No. 3:93-CV-178-WS
- - - - - - - - - -
June 12, 1997
Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Bryce Dallas has appealed the district court’s summary
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 96-60283
- 2 -
judgment dismissing his civil rights claims against Tommy
Jackson. As his appellate brief, Dallas has presented only a
photocopy of a combined cross-motion for summary judgment and
response to Jackson’s summary-judgment motion, which Dallas filed
in the district court. By failing to identify or brief any
appellate issue, Dallas has in effect abandoned any issues he may
have raised on appeal, relative to the findings and conclusions
which the district court stated in granting summary judgment to
Jackson and in denying Dallas’s said motion. See Al-Ra’id v.
Ingle,
69 F.3d 28, 31, 33 (5th Cir. 1995); Weaver v. Puckett,
896
F.2d 126, 128 (5th Cir. 1990).
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.