Filed: Oct. 28, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-11051 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERTO MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:96-CR-117-R - - - - - - - - - - October 21, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appellant Roberto Martinez appeals his sentence for conspiracy to distribut
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-11051 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERTO MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:96-CR-117-R - - - - - - - - - - October 21, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appellant Roberto Martinez appeals his sentence for conspiracy to distribute..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-11051
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROBERTO MARTINEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:96-CR-117-R
- - - - - - - - - -
October 21, 1997
Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appellant Roberto Martinez appeals his sentence for
conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. He argues that the
district court erred: 1) in refusing to give him a 3-point
adjustment for acceptance of responsibility; 2) in calculating
the amount of drugs, because it impermissibly included quantities
of drugs not specified in the count of conviction; and 3) in
giving him a four-level enhancement for being a leader in the
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 96-11051
-2-
conspiracy because there was inadequate evidence to support such.
The Government’s motion to dismiss the appeal because
Martinez waived his right to appeal on the grounds raised is
GRANTED. See United States v. Portillo,
18 F.3d 290, 292-93 (5th
Cir. 1994).
MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.