Filed: Oct. 29, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-11178 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DEMETRIUS KENYON HALL, also known as Jack Frost, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:94-CR-121-Y - - - - - - - - - - October 10, 1997 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Demetrius Kenyon Hall has filed a
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-11178 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DEMETRIUS KENYON HALL, also known as Jack Frost, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:94-CR-121-Y - - - - - - - - - - October 10, 1997 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Demetrius Kenyon Hall has filed a ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-11178
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DEMETRIUS KENYON HALL, also known as
Jack Frost,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:94-CR-121-Y
- - - - - - - - - -
October 10, 1997
Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Demetrius Kenyon Hall has filed
a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the brief and record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. Hall’s
request for a copy of the record and an extension of time in
which to identify nonfrivolous issues for appeal is DENIED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
