Filed: Oct. 24, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-21065 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ISRAEL FLORES, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-95-CR-221-3 - - - - - - - - - - October 17, 1997 Before JONES, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Israel Flores was convicted of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, mail fraud, use of a fictitious nam
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-21065 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ISRAEL FLORES, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-95-CR-221-3 - - - - - - - - - - October 17, 1997 Before JONES, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Israel Flores was convicted of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, mail fraud, use of a fictitious name..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-21065
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ISRAEL FLORES,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-95-CR-221-3
- - - - - - - - - -
October 17, 1997
Before JONES, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Israel Flores was convicted of conspiracy to commit wire
fraud, mail fraud, use of a fictitious name, and money laundering
and aiding and abetting mail and wire fraud. He argues that the
district court erred in calculating his offense level by
referring to the money-laundering guideline and erred in finding
that the loss amount attributable to him was $244,341.60.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 96-21065
- 2 -
The district court did not erred in calculating his offense
level by referring to the money-laundering guideline, U.S.S.G.
§ 2S1.1, because, of the related offenses of conviction, it
carried the highest offense level. See § 3D1.3(a). The district
court also did not err in relying upon the $244,341.60 loss
amount calculated in the presentence report. United States v.
Calverley,
37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc);
U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1.
AFFIRMED.