Filed: Oct. 10, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 96-21090 Summary Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WALTER PATRICK BOLEN, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 96-CR-57-3 _ September 24, 1997 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Walter Patrick Bolen appeals the 18-month sentence imposed by the district court following the acceptance of his guilty p
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 96-21090 Summary Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WALTER PATRICK BOLEN, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 96-CR-57-3 _ September 24, 1997 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Walter Patrick Bolen appeals the 18-month sentence imposed by the district court following the acceptance of his guilty pl..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_____________________
No. 96-21090
Summary Calendar
_____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WALTER PATRICK BOLEN,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 96-CR-57-3
_________________________________________________________________
September 24, 1997
Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Walter Patrick Bolen appeals the 18-month sentence imposed by
the district court following the acceptance of his guilty plea for
aiding and abetting the interstate transportation of stolen goods.
Bolen argues that the district court clearly erred in not finding
that he was a minor participant in the conspiracy and reducing his
offense level accordingly under § 3B1.2 of the U.S. Sentencing
Guidelines. Because Bolen was held responsible for only the amount
of loss attributable to him, § 3B1.2 does not require a reduction
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
in his base offense level even though his activity in the overall
conspiracy may have been minor. United States v. Atanda,
60 F.3d
196, 199 (5th Cir. 1995).
A F F I R M E D.
-2-