Filed: Oct. 29, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-40810 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAMES JASON TINDER, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:96-CR-11 - - - - - - - - - - October 22, 1997 Before DUHE’, DeMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* James Jason Tinder challenges the district court’s finding that he breached the written plea agree
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-40810 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAMES JASON TINDER, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:96-CR-11 - - - - - - - - - - October 22, 1997 Before DUHE’, DeMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* James Jason Tinder challenges the district court’s finding that he breached the written plea agreem..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-40810
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JAMES JASON TINDER,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:96-CR-11
- - - - - - - - - -
October 22, 1997
Before DUHE’, DeMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
James Jason Tinder challenges the district court’s finding
that he breached the written plea agreement, entitling the
Government to rescind the agreement. After the district court
made this finding, Tinder entered an unconditional guilty plea to
conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine
and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine. See 21
U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (846). By entering an unconditional
guilty plea, Tinder waived his right to challenge the district
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 96-40810
-2-
court’s finding that he breached the rescinded written plea
agreement. See United States v. Smallwood,
920 F.2d 1231, 1240
(5th Cir. 1991). A claim that is waived is "entirely
unreviewable" by this court. United States v. Musquiz,
45 F.3d
927, 931 (5th Cir. 1995).
AFFIRMED.