Filed: Oct. 28, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-40217 Conference Calendar EDDIE TYLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus M. DODSON, Captain; M.W. HALL, Warden; M. WEAR; JOHN GIBERT; G.J. JOHNSON, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-96-CV-306 - - - - - - - - - - October 23, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Texas prisoner Eddie Tyler, No.
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-40217 Conference Calendar EDDIE TYLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus M. DODSON, Captain; M.W. HALL, Warden; M. WEAR; JOHN GIBERT; G.J. JOHNSON, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-96-CV-306 - - - - - - - - - - October 23, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Texas prisoner Eddie Tyler, No. ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-40217
Conference Calendar
EDDIE TYLER,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
M. DODSON, Captain; M.W. HALL, Warden;
M. WEAR; JOHN GIBERT; G.J. JOHNSON,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. C-96-CV-306
- - - - - - - - - -
October 23, 1997
Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Texas prisoner Eddie Tyler, No. 535926, is BARRED from
proceeding in forma pauperis (IFP) under the Prison Litigation
Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA) because, on at least three prior
occasions while incarcerated, Tyler has brought an action or
appeal in a United States court that was dismissed as frivolous.
Tyler v. Scott, No. 96-40997 (5th Cir. Aug. 8, 1997)(affirmance
of district court’s dismissal of lawsuit as frivolous); Tyler v.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 97-40217
-2-
Scott, No. 96-10619 (5th Cir. Aug. 22, 1996)(same); Tyler v.
Perez, No.96-40817 (5th Cir. Aug. 15, 1997) (voluntary dismissal
of appeal from district court’s dismissal of lawsuit as
frivolous); see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); Adepegba v. Hammons,
103
F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, Tyler’s IFP status
is DECERTIFIED, and he may not proceed IFP in any civil action or
appeal filed while he is in prison unless he is under imminent
danger of serious physical injury. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
Tyler has 15 days from the date of this order to pay the
full appellate filing fee of $105 to the clerk of the district
court, should he wish to proceed with his appeal. Failure to pay
the filing fee in full will result in dismissal of Tyler’s
appeal. See 5th Cir. R. 42.3.1.2.
IFP DECERTIFIED; APPEAL DISMISSED IF FULL FILING FEE NOT
PAID.