Filed: Oct. 28, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-40218 Conference Calendar RUBEN YBARRA, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus JOHN RICHARD HERNANDEZ; RAY RIVERA; RAYNALDO ROSENDEZ, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-96-CV-93 - - - - - - - - - - October 21, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Rueben Ybarra, Texas prisoner # 630410, appeals the
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-40218 Conference Calendar RUBEN YBARRA, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus JOHN RICHARD HERNANDEZ; RAY RIVERA; RAYNALDO ROSENDEZ, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-96-CV-93 - - - - - - - - - - October 21, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Rueben Ybarra, Texas prisoner # 630410, appeals the ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-40218
Conference Calendar
RUBEN YBARRA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
JOHN RICHARD HERNANDEZ; RAY RIVERA;
RAYNALDO ROSENDEZ,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. C-96-CV-93
- - - - - - - - - -
October 21, 1997
Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Rueben Ybarra, Texas prisoner # 630410, appeals the district
court’s denial of his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)
motion to reinstate his civil rights case which, nine months
earlier, the district court had dismissed for frivolousness and
for failure to state a claim. Ybarra has made no showing that
the district court abused its discretion by denying the motion.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 97-40218
-2-
See Carimi v. Royal Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc.,
959 F.2d 1344,
1345 (5th Cir. 1992).
This appeal presents no issue of arguable merit and is thus
frivolous. Howard v. King,
707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983).
Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R.
42.2.