Filed: Oct. 10, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: REVISED - October 10, 1997 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No.97-50313 Summary Calendar IN THE MATTER OF: DONALD E. GHIDONI: Debtor, DONALD E. GHIDONI, Appellant, versus HILL COUNTRY S.A., LTD.; JOHNNY W. THOMAS, TRUSTEE, Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (SA-96-CV-68) October 3, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, DAVIS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Donald E. Ghidoni, debtor in Chapter 11 and Chapter 7 proc
Summary: REVISED - October 10, 1997 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No.97-50313 Summary Calendar IN THE MATTER OF: DONALD E. GHIDONI: Debtor, DONALD E. GHIDONI, Appellant, versus HILL COUNTRY S.A., LTD.; JOHNNY W. THOMAS, TRUSTEE, Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (SA-96-CV-68) October 3, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, DAVIS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Donald E. Ghidoni, debtor in Chapter 11 and Chapter 7 proce..
More
REVISED - October 10, 1997
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No.97-50313
Summary Calendar
IN THE MATTER OF: DONALD E. GHIDONI:
Debtor,
DONALD E. GHIDONI,
Appellant,
versus
HILL COUNTRY S.A., LTD.;
JOHNNY W. THOMAS, TRUSTEE,
Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
(SA-96-CV-68)
October 3, 1997
Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, DAVIS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Donald E. Ghidoni, debtor in Chapter 11 and Chapter 7 proceedings, appeals
the district court’s affirmance of a judgment of the bankruptcy court in the Chapter
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
11 proceeding denying the debtor’s homestead exemptions and granting Hill
Country S.A., Ltd., declaratory relief, as well as the district court’s dismissal of an
appeal from the bankruptcy court in the Chapter 7 proceeding because the
appellant’s brief was not timely filed.
Our review of the record reflects neither clearly erroneous findings of fact
nor error of law and, on the facts as found and analysis made by the district court
in its Order dated April 21, 1997, the judgment appealed in the Chapter 11
proceeding is AFFIRMED.
Upon examination of the applicable Bankruptcy Rules, and for the reasons
well stated in the district court’s Order Dismissing Appeal signed on April 1, 1997
and Order Denying Motion for Rehearing signed on April 16, 1997, there was no
abuse of the district court’s discretion in dismissing the appeal in the Chapter 7
proceeding.1 The district court’s dismissal of the appeal in the Chapter 7
proceeding is AFFIRMED.
1
In the Matter of Braniff Airways, Inc.,
774 F.2d 1303 (5th Cir. 1985).
2