Filed: Oct. 28, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-60041 Conference Calendar EUSTAQUIO VILLATORO-VILLATORO, Petitioner, versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. - - - - - - - - - - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A 74 159 878 - - - - - - - - - - October 21, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Eustaquio Villatoro-Villatoro petitions for review of the Board of Immigration
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-60041 Conference Calendar EUSTAQUIO VILLATORO-VILLATORO, Petitioner, versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. - - - - - - - - - - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A 74 159 878 - - - - - - - - - - October 21, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Eustaquio Villatoro-Villatoro petitions for review of the Board of Immigration A..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-60041
Conference Calendar
EUSTAQUIO VILLATORO-VILLATORO,
Petitioner,
versus
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
Respondent.
- - - - - - - - - -
Petition for Review of an Order
of the Board of Immigration Appeals
BIA No. A 74 159 878
- - - - - - - - - -
October 21, 1997
Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Eustaquio Villatoro-Villatoro petitions for review of the
Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision dismissing his appeal from
the immigration judge’s decision to deny his application for
asylum and for a withholding of deportation. We have reviewed
the record and the briefs and determine that the Board’s decision
is supported by substantial evidence. See Carbajal-Gonzalez v.
INS, 78 F.3d 194, 197 (5th Cir. 1996). The petition for review
is DENIED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No.
-2-
