Filed: Nov. 12, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-50287 Summary Calendar LEON GONZALEZ, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant, versus CITY OF SAN ANTONIO; JIM WELLS, Individually and in his Official Capacity as a San Antonio Police Officer; SOUTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY; J.E. GREBER, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Administrator of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Distri
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-50287 Summary Calendar LEON GONZALEZ, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant, versus CITY OF SAN ANTONIO; JIM WELLS, Individually and in his Official Capacity as a San Antonio Police Officer; SOUTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY; J.E. GREBER, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Administrator of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Distric..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-50287
Summary Calendar
LEON GONZALEZ, JR.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
CITY OF SAN ANTONIO; JIM WELLS, Individually and in his Official
Capacity as a San Antonio Police Officer; SOUTHWEST BELL
TELEPHONE COMPANY; J.E. GREBER, Individually and in his Official
Capacity as Administrator of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 97-50287
- - - - - - - - - -
November 3, 1997
Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Leon Gonzalez, Jr., appeals the dismissal, without
prejudice, for failure to state a claim of his wrongful-
termination lawsuit. He contends that the district court erred
in refusing to remand the case to state court and in dismissing
his complaint.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 97-50287
-2-
We have reviewed the briefs and the record and find no
error. Gonzalez’s claims were preempted by § 301 of the Labor
Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185. See, e.g., Thomas v.
LTV Corp.,
39 F.3d 611, 616 (5th Cir. 1994). Because he failed
to exhaust his contractual remedies prior to instituting this
lawsuit, dismissal without prejudice was appropriate. Allis-
Chalmers Corp. v. Lueck,
471 U.S. 202, 204 n.1, 220-21 (1985).
AFFIRMED.