Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Cantu, 95-20806 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 95-20806 Visitors: 14
Filed: Apr. 24, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-20806 Summary Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARIA INEZ CANTU, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-94-CR-158-1 _ April 21, 1998 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Maria Inez Cantu appeals her sentence following her conviction for conspiracy. She argues that the district court erred by inc
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT


                       _____________________

                            No. 95-20806
                          Summary Calendar
                       _____________________



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff-Appellee,
                                versus
MARIA INEZ CANTU,

                                             Defendant-Appellant.
________________________________________________________________

           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                      USDC No. H-94-CR-158-1
_________________________________________________________________

                            April 21, 1998

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Maria Inez Cantu appeals her sentence following her conviction

for conspiracy.     She argues that the district court erred by

increasing her offense level by two pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1

for possession of a firearm.   We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error.   Given the evidence in the PSR that a loaded

pistol was discovered on the headboard to the bed in the master

bedroom at Cantu’s residence next to a large amount of currency,

the district court did not err by increasing her offense level


     *
      Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
pursuant to § 2D1.1(b)(1).   Accordingly, the judgment of the

district court is

                                              A F F I R M E D.




                             -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer