Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ruiz v. Reno, 96-31305 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 96-31305 Visitors: 27
Filed: Mar. 30, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-31305 Summary Calendar WISTING FIERRO RUIZ ET AL., Plaintiffs, WISTING FIERRO RUIZ; JAIRO FERNANDO RIASCOS; Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus JANET RENO, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL., Defendants, JANET RENO, U.S. Attorney General; KEITH HALL, Warden; RITA A. STANLEY; R. KEVIN MCHUGH; NANCY A. HOOKS; U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, DIRECTOR; UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appea
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                           No. 96-31305
                         Summary Calendar


WISTING FIERRO RUIZ ET AL.,

                                         Plaintiffs,

WISTING FIERRO RUIZ; JAIRO FERNANDO RIASCOS;

                                         Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

JANET RENO, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.,

                                         Defendants,

JANET RENO, U.S. Attorney General;
KEITH HALL, Warden; RITA A. STANLEY;
R. KEVIN MCHUGH; NANCY A. HOOKS;
U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, DIRECTOR;
UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

                                         Defendants-Appellees.

                        - - - - - - - - - -
           Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Western District of Louisiana
                         USDC No. 95-CV-191
                        - - - - - - - - - -
                           March 24, 1998
Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Wisting Fierro Ruiz (federal prisoner No. 59534-079) and

Jairo Fernando Riascos (federal prisoner No. 05062-003) appeal


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 96-31305
                               -2-

the dismissal of their complaint seeking monetary damages for

alleged civil rights violations arising out of deportation

proceedings initiated by the Attorney General.   We affirm on the

alternative basis that the district court lacked subject-matter

jurisdiction to review appellants’ claim.   See 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252(g).

     AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer