Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Davis, 97-30737 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 97-30737 Visitors: 87
Filed: Apr. 15, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-30737 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BURNELL DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 96-CR-323-ALL - - - - - - - - - - April 8, 1998 Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Burnell Davis appeals from his sentence for being a convicted felon in possession of a firearm. He
More
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                              No. 97-30737
                          Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                           Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BURNELL DAVIS,

                                           Defendant-Appellant.

                        - - - - - - - - - -
          Appeal from the United States District Court
              for the Eastern District of Louisiana
                      USDC No. 96-CR-323-ALL
                        - - - - - - - - - -
                           April 8, 1998

Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Burnell Davis appeals from his sentence for being a

convicted felon in possession of a firearm.     He contends solely

that the district court erred by calculating his base offense

level as 20 because his previous state-court conviction of simple

burglary of an inhabited dwelling was a “crime of violence” for

purposes of U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A).    Davis’s contention is

frivolous; simple burglary of an inhabited dwelling is a “crime

of violence” for guideline purposes.     See United States v.



     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                           No. 97-30737
                                -2-

Claiborne 
132 F.3d 253
, 255-56 (5th Cir. 1998); United States v.

Guadardo, 
40 F.3d 102
, 103-05 (5th Cir. 1994); § 4B1.2(a)(2).

     APPEAL DISMISSED.   5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer