Durkin v. State Farm Mutual, 97-30760 (1998)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 97-30760
Visitors: 18
Filed: Apr. 15, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS for the Fifth Circuit _ No. 97-30760 Summary Calendar _ STEVE DURKIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, VERSUS STATE FARM MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (96-CV-2577) _ April 3, 1998 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* For reasons assigned by the district court in its thorough order and reasons entered June 27, 1997, the judgment of the district court
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS for the Fifth Circuit _ No. 97-30760 Summary Calendar _ STEVE DURKIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, VERSUS STATE FARM MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (96-CV-2577) _ April 3, 1998 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* For reasons assigned by the district court in its thorough order and reasons entered June 27, 1997, the judgment of the district court ..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS for the Fifth Circuit _____________________________________ No. 97-30760 Summary Calendar _____________________________________ STEVE DURKIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, VERSUS STATE FARM MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. ______________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (96-CV-2577) ______________________________________________________ April 3, 1998 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* For reasons assigned by the district court in its thorough order and reasons entered June 27, 1997, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
