Filed: Mar. 30, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-40582 Summary Calendar DAVID H. COERS, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant, VERSUS TEXAS GUARANTEED STUDENT LOAN CORPORATION; JOE L. McCORMICK, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas (M-93-CV-178) March 27, 1998 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Court notes that David H. Coers, Jr., Appellant, has failed to comply with the Court’s order of January 9,
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-40582 Summary Calendar DAVID H. COERS, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant, VERSUS TEXAS GUARANTEED STUDENT LOAN CORPORATION; JOE L. McCORMICK, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas (M-93-CV-178) March 27, 1998 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Court notes that David H. Coers, Jr., Appellant, has failed to comply with the Court’s order of January 9, 1..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-40582 Summary Calendar DAVID H. COERS, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant, VERSUS TEXAS GUARANTEED STUDENT LOAN CORPORATION; JOE L. McCORMICK, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas (M-93-CV-178) March 27, 1998 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Court notes that David H. Coers, Jr., Appellant, has failed to comply with the Court’s order of January 9, 1998 by removing the excess papers in the record excerpts. However, after * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. 1 considering the merits, we waive compliance by this pro se Appellant. We have considered the record and the briefs of the parties and the applicable authorities and affirm for essentially the reasons stated by the District Judge in his memorandum opinion. All motions not previously ruled on are DENIED. AFFIRMED. MOTIONS DENIED. 2
