Filed: Mar. 30, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-41026 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus COY RAY DINGLER, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Texas (6:96-CR-55-1) March 26, 1998 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, WIENER and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court appointed counsel for Coy Ray Dingler has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,1 and has moved to withdraw. Our i
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-41026 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus COY RAY DINGLER, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Texas (6:96-CR-55-1) March 26, 1998 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, WIENER and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court appointed counsel for Coy Ray Dingler has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,1 and has moved to withdraw. Our in..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-41026
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
COY RAY DINGLER,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Eastern District of Texas
(6:96-CR-55-1)
March 26, 1998
Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, WIENER and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court appointed counsel for Coy Ray Dingler has filed a brief as required by
Anders v. California,1 and has moved to withdraw. Our independent review of the
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
1
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
brief, Dingler’s response and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue which may
be presented herein. Accordingly, counsel’s motion is granted, counsel is excused
from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. 2
2
See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
2