Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Castillo-Rodriguez, 97-41351 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 97-41351 Visitors: 29
Filed: Apr. 15, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-41351 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus EFRAIN CASTILLO-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-97-CR-239-1 - - - - - - - - - - April 8, 1998 Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Efrain Castillo-Rodriguez appeals his judgment of conviction and sentence after pleading
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 97-41351
                        Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

EFRAIN CASTILLO-RODRIGUEZ,

                                         Defendant-Appellee.

                       - - - - - - - - - -
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                     USDC No. B-97-CR-239-1
                       - - - - - - - - - -
                          April 8, 1998

Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Efrain Castillo-Rodriguez appeals his judgment of conviction

and sentence after pleading guilty to reentry after deportation

in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.   He argues that he was charged

with and pleaded guilty to § 1326(a), simple reentry, but that he

was sentenced as if he had pleaded guilty to reentry following a

conviction for an aggravated felony for purposes of § 1326(b)(2).

His argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 
1998 WL 126904
,

at *3, *8 (U.S. Mar. 24, 1998).


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
            No. 97-41351
                - 2 -

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer