Filed: May 18, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 09-50838 Document: 00511114498 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/18/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 18, 2010 No. 09-50838 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ROBERTO CARLOS HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:09-CR-1392-1 Before JOLLY, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:*
Summary: Case: 09-50838 Document: 00511114498 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/18/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 18, 2010 No. 09-50838 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ROBERTO CARLOS HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:09-CR-1392-1 Before JOLLY, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* ..
More
Case: 09-50838 Document: 00511114498 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/18/2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
May 18, 2010
No. 09-50838
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
ROBERTO CARLOS HERNANDEZ,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 3:09-CR-1392-1
Before JOLLY, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Roberto Carlos
Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Hernandez has not filed a
response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.