Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

White v. Interstate Brake, 97-60384 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 97-60384 Visitors: 13
Filed: Apr. 15, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-60384 Conference Calendar EDDIE WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus INTERSTATE BRAKE PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:96-CV-005-S-A - - - - - - - - - - April 8, 1998 Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Eddie White appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment for Interstate B
More
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                              No. 97-60384
                          Conference Calendar



EDDIE WHITE,

                                           Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

INTERSTATE BRAKE PRODUCTS, INC.,

                                           Defendant-Appellee.

                       - - - - - - - - - -
          Appeal from the United States District Court
            for the Northern District of Mississippi
                    USDC No. 3:96--CV-005-S-A
                       - - - - - - - - - -
                          April 8, 1998

Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Eddie White appeals from the district court’s grant of

summary judgment for Interstate Brake Products, Inc.       We have

reviewed the record and the briefs and find no reversible error

in the reasoning set forth by the district court.        White v.

Interstate Brake Prods., Inc., No. 3:96-CV-005-S-A (N.D. Miss.

June 2, 1997).

     Further, we find that White’s appeal is without arguable

merit and thus frivolous.     See Howard v. King, 
707 F.2d 215
,



     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                           No. 97-60384
                                -2-

219-20 (5th Cir. 1983).   Because the appeal is frivolous, it is

DISMISSED.   5th Cir. R. 42.2.

     All outstanding motions are DENIED.

     DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer