Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bowens v. Cain, 08-30969 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 08-30969 Visitors: 21
Filed: May 19, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 08-30969 Document: 00511115995 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/19/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 13, 2010 No. 09-30989 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk KELVIN WELLS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. TIMOTHY TRAYNOR, Defendant-Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:09-CV-649 Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Kelvin Wells appeals
More
Case: 08-30969 Document: 00511115995 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/19/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 13, 2010 No. 09-30989 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk KELVIN WELLS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. TIMOTHY TRAYNOR, Defendant-Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:09-CV-649 Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Kelvin Wells appeals the dismissal of his civil suit against Timothy Traynor. Wells claims that Traynor caused the death of his father as retaliation for Wells’s whistleblowing activities. The magistrate judge construed Wells’s complaint as a claim for wrongful death under L A. C IV. C ODE art. 2315.2 and recommended dismissal of the claim without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, because the defendant was also a resident of Louisiana. Wells did not object to the magistrate’s recommendation and the case was dismissed. On * Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. Case: 08-30969 Document: 00511115995 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/19/2010 No. 09-30989 appeal, he argues that the death took place onboard the M/V ATLANTIC on November 22, 1997 and that the district court thus had maritime jurisdiction. Even if these allegations would be sufficient to establish the district court’s jurisdiction, they were not raised before the district court and are waived on appeal. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer