Filed: Apr. 20, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 97-60571 Summary Calendar _ LAURA ESTELA SALAZAR DE PEREZ, Petitioner, versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals A73 748 517 April 17, 1998 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Laura Estela Salazar De Perez, represented by counsel, appeals from a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming the immigrat
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 97-60571 Summary Calendar _ LAURA ESTELA SALAZAR DE PEREZ, Petitioner, versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals A73 748 517 April 17, 1998 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Laura Estela Salazar De Perez, represented by counsel, appeals from a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming the immigrati..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 97-60571
Summary Calendar
____________________
LAURA ESTELA SALAZAR DE PEREZ,
Petitioner,
versus
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
Respondent.
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
A73 748 517
April 17, 1998
Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Laura Estela Salazar De Perez, represented by counsel, appeals
from a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming
the immigration judge’s decision denying her motion to reopen
deportation proceedings. Petitioner, through her counsel, has
failed to provide any record citations in her statement of facts
and also has failed to provide citations to legal authorities in
support of her argument. See FED. R. APP. P. 28(a)(4) & (6),(e);
5th Cir. R. 28.2.3. Moreover, petitioner has failed to explain why
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.
47.5.4.
the Board of Immigration Appeals abused its discretion in
dismissing her administrative appeal. Accordingly, the petition is
DISMISSED. See Moore v. FDIC,
993 F.2d 106, 107 (5th Cir. 1993).
This dismissal will be reconsidered if petitioner files a
properly supported motion for rehearing within 14 days of the date
of this opinion.
PETITION DISMISSED
- 2 -