Filed: May 20, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 09-11002 Document: 00511117523 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/20/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 20, 2010 No. 09-11002 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. TONY MOSLEY, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:09-CR-62-1 Before KING, STEWART, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal
Summary: Case: 09-11002 Document: 00511117523 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/20/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 20, 2010 No. 09-11002 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. TONY MOSLEY, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:09-CR-62-1 Before KING, STEWART, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal P..
More
Case: 09-11002 Document: 00511117523 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/20/2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
May 20, 2010
No. 09-11002
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
TONY MOSLEY,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:09-CR-62-1
Before KING, STEWART, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Tony Mosley has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Mosley has not filed a response. Our
independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous
issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.