Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Robert Britton, 09-40363 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 09-40363 Visitors: 50
Filed: May 26, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: Case: 09-40363 Document: 00511123164 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/26/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 26, 2010 No. 09-40363 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ROBERT G. BRITTON, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:08-CR-34-1 Before KING, STEWART, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The att
More
     Case: 09-40363     Document: 00511123164          Page: 1    Date Filed: 05/26/2010




            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                     FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                     Fifth Circuit

                                                  FILED
                                                                            May 26, 2010
                                     No. 09-40363
                                   Summary Calendar                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ROBERT G. BRITTON,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Eastern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 6:08-CR-34-1


Before KING, STEWART, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        The attorney appointed to represent Robert G. Britton has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Britton has not filed a response. Our independent review of the
record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.

        *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer