Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Verizon Business Network Services, Inc. v. Diana Day-Cartee, 09-60407 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 09-60407 Visitors: 9
Filed: May 26, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: Case: 09-60407 Document: 00511122961 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/26/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 26, 2010 No. 09-60407 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk VERIZON BUSINESS NETWORK SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DIANA DAY-CARTEE, Defendant-Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi No. 3:06-CV-650 Before GARWOOD, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:*
More
Case: 09-60407 Document: 00511122961 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/26/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 26, 2010 No. 09-60407 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk VERIZON BUSINESS NETWORK SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DIANA DAY-CARTEE, Defendant-Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi No. 3:06-CV-650 Before GARWOOD, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* This dispute centers on whether defendant Diana Day-Cartee must indem- nify plaintiff Verizon Business Network Services, Inc. (“Verizon”), for withhold- * Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. Case: 09-60407 Document: 00511122961 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/26/2010 No. 09-60407 ing-tax liability arising from a transfer of stock options. Day-Cartee appeals a summary judgment directing her to pay more than $2.5 million to Verizon. The issue of tax liability is pending in the United States Tax Court. This case should not proceed until the tax issue has been determined. Accordingly, we vacate the summary judgment and remand to the district court (in which the magistrate judge is sitting by consent). We instruct the district court to stay the case awaiting a decision by the Tax Court. We note that the district court will have jurisdiction once the Tax Court has ruled on the merits of the tax dispute. The judgment is VACATED and REMANDED. We express no view on the ultimate merits of the case or on what rulings the district court should make on remand. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer