Filed: Jun. 12, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-10692 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTHONY CRENSHAW, also known as Ant, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:96-CR-128-2-Y - - - - - - - - - - June 3, 1998 Before DUHE’, DeMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court appointed counsel for Anthony Crenshaw has filed a brief as required by A
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-10692 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTHONY CRENSHAW, also known as Ant, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:96-CR-128-2-Y - - - - - - - - - - June 3, 1998 Before DUHE’, DeMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court appointed counsel for Anthony Crenshaw has filed a brief as required by An..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-10692
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ANTHONY CRENSHAW, also known as Ant,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:96-CR-128-2-Y
- - - - - - - - - -
June 3, 1998
Before DUHE’, DeMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court appointed counsel for Anthony Crenshaw has filed a
brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
