Filed: Jun. 24, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 08-10965 Document: 00511150629 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 22, 2010 No. 08-10965 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARIO MEDRANO-BONILLA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:08-CR-121-ALL Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIA
Summary: Case: 08-10965 Document: 00511150629 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 22, 2010 No. 08-10965 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARIO MEDRANO-BONILLA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:08-CR-121-ALL Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM..
More
Case: 08-10965 Document: 00511150629 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
June 22, 2010
No. 08-10965
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
MARIO MEDRANO-BONILLA,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:08-CR-121-ALL
Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mario Medrano-
Bonilla has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Medrano-Bonilla has not filed a
response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.