Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Franco, 08-51306 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 08-51306 Visitors: 29
Filed: Jun. 24, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 08-51306 Document: 00511150254 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 22, 2010 No. 08-51306 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. FILOMENO TREVINO FRANCO, also known as Teeny, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:08-CR-92-ALL Before BENAVIDES, PRADO and SOUTHWICK, C
More
     Case: 08-51306     Document: 00511150254          Page: 1    Date Filed: 06/22/2010




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                            June 22, 2010
                                     No. 08-51306
                                   Summary Calendar                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FILOMENO TREVINO FRANCO, also known as Teeny,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant


                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Western District of Texas
                             USDC No. 7:08-CR-92-ALL


Before BENAVIDES, PRADO and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        The attorney appointed to represent Filomeno Trevino Franco has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Franco has filed a response. Our independent
review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Franco’s response discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal.           Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer