Filed: Jun. 24, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 09-10696 Document: 00511149791 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 22, 2010 No. 09-10696 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. DARRELL MURPHY, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:09-CR-3-4 Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The att
Summary: Case: 09-10696 Document: 00511149791 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 22, 2010 No. 09-10696 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. DARRELL MURPHY, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:09-CR-3-4 Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The atto..
More
Case: 09-10696 Document: 00511149791 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
June 22, 2010
No. 09-10696
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
DARRELL MURPHY,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:09-CR-3-4
Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Darrell Murphy has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386
U.S. 738 (1967). Murphy has not filed a response. Our independent review of
the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.