Filed: Jun. 24, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 09-11059 Document: 00511149885 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 22, 2010 No. 09-11059 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. PAUL MARTIN HENRIKSON, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:09-CR-16-1 Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:*
Summary: Case: 09-11059 Document: 00511149885 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 22, 2010 No. 09-11059 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. PAUL MARTIN HENRIKSON, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:09-CR-16-1 Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* ..
More
Case: 09-11059 Document: 00511149885 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
June 22, 2010
No. 09-11059
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
PAUL MARTIN HENRIKSON,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:09-CR-16-1
Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Paul Martin Henrikson
presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Whaley,
577 F.3d 254, 258-64 (5th Cir. 2009), in which this court rejected constitutional
challenges to the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act. The
Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment
of the district court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.