Filed: Jun. 24, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 09-41224 Document: 00511150146 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 22, 2010 No. 09-41224 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JUAN CARLOS COMPIAN, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:09-CR-220-1 Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:*
Summary: Case: 09-41224 Document: 00511150146 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 22, 2010 No. 09-41224 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JUAN CARLOS COMPIAN, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:09-CR-220-1 Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* A..
More
Case: 09-41224 Document: 00511150146 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
June 22, 2010
No. 09-41224
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JUAN CARLOS COMPIAN,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:09-CR-220-1
Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Juan Carlos Compian raises
arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt,
586
F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir. 2009), cert. denied,
130 S. Ct. 1920 (2010), which
reaffirmed the holding in United States v. Gamez-Gonzalez,
319 F.3d 695, 700
(5th Cir. 2003), that knowledge of drug type and quantity is not a material
element of the offense. The appellant’s unopposed motion for summary
disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.