Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Jose Hinojosa, 09-41272 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 09-41272 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 24, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 09-41272 Document: 00511150178 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 22, 2010 No. 09-41272 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE HINOJOSA, also known as Joe Anthony Hinojosa, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:09-CR-480-1 Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN,
More
     Case: 09-41272     Document: 00511150178          Page: 1    Date Filed: 06/22/2010




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                            June 22, 2010
                                     No. 09-41272
                                  Conference Calendar                       Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE HINOJOSA, also known as Joe Anthony Hinojosa,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant


                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Southern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 2:09-CR-480-1


Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jose Hinojosa presents
arguments that he concedes are foreclosed. See United States v. Daugherty, 
264 F.3d 513
, 518 (5th Cir. 2001) (rejecting Commerce Clause-based challenge to 18
U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)); United States v. De Leon, 
170 F.3d 494
, 499 (5th Cir. 1999)
(same); United States v. Rawls, 
85 F.3d 240
, 242 (5th Cir. 1996) (same). The
Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment
of the district court is AFFIRMED.

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer